Evidence for benefit vs novelty in new intubation equipment

92Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A myriad of new intubation equipment has been introduced commercially since the appearance of Macintosh/Miller blades in the 1940s. We review the role of devices that are relevant to current clinical practice based on their presence in the scientific literature. The comparative performance of new vs traditional direct laryngoscopes, their complications, their use in awake intubation techniques and the prediction of unsuccessful intubation with new devices are reviewed. Manikin studies are of limited value in this area. We conclude that in both predicted and unpredicted difficult or failed intubation, carefully selected new intubation equipment has a high success rate for tracheal intubation. Ideally, such devices should be available in all settings where tracheal intubation is performed. Most importantly, experience and competence with any of the new devices are critical for their successful use in any clinical setting. © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Behringer, E. C., & Kristensen, M. S. (2011). Evidence for benefit vs novelty in new intubation equipment. Anaesthesia, 66(SUPPL. 2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06935.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free