Responding to Editors and Referees

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

You have sent a polished version of your manuscript to a journal, and after a few months, you will receive a packet with an editor's letter and anonymous reviews by 2–4 referees. Each review will be a critique that includes an overall evaluation and a list of items that need improving. Based on the reviews, the editor's letter will put your paper into one of three categories: The manuscript is accepted, pending specified changes. The manuscript requires revision and re-review. The manuscript is rejected. You should have started the road to publication by submitting your manuscript to a demanding journal, one with a high rejection rate. If your manuscript is rejected, use the referees' comments to make improvements, and submit the paper to another journal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Responding to Editors and Referees. (2009). In From Research to Manuscript (pp. 179–181). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9467-5_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free