Counting the costs of accreditation in acute care: An activity-based costing approach

23Citations
Citations of this article
111Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the costs of hospital accreditation in Australia. Design: Mixed methods design incorporating: stakeholder analysis; survey design and implementation; activity-based costs analysis; and expert panel review. Setting: Acute care hospitals accredited by the Australian Council for Health Care Standards. Participants: Six acute public hospitals across four States. Results: Accreditation costs varied from 0.03% to 0.60% of total hospital operating costs per year, averaged across the 4-year accreditation cycle. Relatively higher costs were associated with the surveys years and with smaller facilities. At a national level these costs translate to $A36.83 million, equivalent to 0.1% of acute public hospital recurrent expenditure in the 2012 fiscal year. Conclusions: This is the first time accreditation costs have been independently evaluated across a wide range of hospitals and highlights the additional cost burden for smaller facilities. A better understanding of the costs allows policymakers to assess alternative accreditation and other quality improvement strategies, and understand their impact across a range of facilities. This methodology can be adapted to assess international accreditation programmes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mumford, V., Greenfield, D., Hogden, A., Forde, K., Westbrook, J., & Braithwaite, J. (2015). Counting the costs of accreditation in acute care: An activity-based costing approach. BMJ Open, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008850

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free