Emergency Medical Services Prehospital Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US: A Brief Literature Review

10Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the US through a brief systematic review of available literature in context with international prehospital counterparts. An exploration of the NCBI repository was performed using a search string of relevant keywords which returned n=5128 results; articles that met the inclusion criteria (n=77) were reviewed and analyzed in accordance with PRISMA and PROSPERO recommendations. Methodical quality was assessed using critical appraisal tools, and the Egger’s test was used for risk of bias reduction upon linear regression analysis of a funnel plot. Sources of heterogeneity as defined by P < 0.10 or I^2 > 50% were interrogated. Findings were considered within ten domains: structural/systemic; clinical outcomes; clinical assessment; treatment; special populations; dispatch/activation; education; mental health; perspectives/experiences; and transport. Findings suggest, EMS clinicians have likely made significant and unmeasured contributions to care during the pandemic via nontraditional roles, ie, COVID-19 testing and vaccine deployment. EMS plays a critical role in counteracting the COVID-19 pandemic in addition to the worsening opioid epidemic, both of which disproportionately impact patients of color. As such, being uniquely influential on clinical outcomes, these providers may benefit from standardized education on care and access disparities such as racial identity. Access to distance learning continuing education opportunities may increase rates of provider recertification. Additionally, there is a high prevalence of vaccine hesitancy among surveyed nationally registered EMS providers. Continued rigorous investigation on the impact of COVID-19 on EMS systems and personnel is warranted to ensure informed preparation for future pandemic and infectious disease responses.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53151Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

48716Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

12311Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Psychosocial Work Stress and Occupational Stressors in Emergency Medical Services

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prehospital Emergency Care for Adults with Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identification of prehospital emergency challenges in the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ventura, C. A. I., Denton, E. E., David, J. A., Schoenfelder, B. J., Mela, L., Lumia, R. P., … Haldar, B. (2022). Emergency Medical Services Prehospital Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US: A Brief Literature Review. Open Access Emergency Medicine. Dove Medical Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S366006

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

75%

Researcher 4

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

55%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

30%

Engineering 2

10%

Computer Science 1

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 14

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free