Intensive insulin therapy versus conventional glycemic control in patients with acute neurological injury: A prospective controlled trial

33Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare intensive insulin therapy to conventional glycemic control in patients with acute neurological injury evaluating neurological outcome and morbimortality. Method: Patients with two glycemias above 150 mg/dL 12 hours after admission were randomized to receive intensive insulin therapy (G1) or conventional treatment (G2). We evaluated a subgroup of patients with acute brain injury from July, 2004 to June, 2006. Results: G1 patients (n=31) received 70.5 (45.1-87.5) units of insulin/day while G2 patients (n=19) received 2 (0.6-14.1) units/day (p<0.0001). The median glycemia was comparable in both groups (p=0.16). Hypoglycemia occurred in 2 patients (6.4%) in G1 and in 1 patient (5.8%) in G2 (p=1.0). Mortality in G1 was of 25.8% and of 35.2% in G2 (relative reduction of 27%). Neurological outcome was similar in both groups. Conclusion: A less strict intensive insulin therapy can reduce hypoglycemia and still maintain its benefits.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Azevedo, J. R. A., Lima, E. R. M., Cossetti, R. J. D., & De Azevedo, R. P. (2007). Intensive insulin therapy versus conventional glycemic control in patients with acute neurological injury: A prospective controlled trial. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 65(3 B), 733–738. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282x2007000500001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free