Planning for Sustainability: Between Risks and Lifeworlds

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, Planning for sustainability: Between risks and lifeworlds, Mikaela Vasstrøm and Hans Kjetil Lysgård present ideas of a planning study that takes a critical perspective on planning. What are the alternative planning ideas? Planning is a field where different paradigms meet. How can one approach that? Their suggestion is a combination of participatory and critical planning. There is a strong account of planning and sustainability with better links between planning and Higher Education. Empowerment may provide a connection. For both planning and education, we need an understanding of context. The discussion of universities is thought-provoking.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vasstrøm, M., & Lysgård, H. K. (2015). Planning for Sustainability: Between Risks and Lifeworlds. In CSR, Sustainability, Ethics and Governance (pp. 127–143). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15919-5_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free