Framing the Human Dimensions of Mountain Systems: Integrating Social Science Paradigms for a Global Network of Mountain Observatories

8Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Global Network of Mountain Observatories (GNOMO) is an international initiative seeking to increase communication and collaboration and align methodologies to assess commonalities and differences across the world's mountain landscapes. Oriented toward sustainable mountain development, GNOMO requires the integration of social and natural sciences, as well as a diverse array of stakeholder perspectives. This paper highlights challenges associated with integrating social sciences because of the inherent paradigmatic differences within the social sciences. The value orientations of mountain researchers, as well as the divergent societal and institutional values regarding mountains, create a need for new approaches to observing mountain landscapes. A framework is presented to organize complex information about mountain social-ecological systems based on human conditions (from vulnerability to wellbeing), environmental actions (from degradation to stewardship), and environmental conditions that vary across time, space, and scales. A multiparadigmatic, multimethod approach is proposed to combine theory-driven quantitative indicators, qualitative perspectives from diverse knowledge standpoints, and critical inquiries into power relationships to fully represent dynamic mountain systems.

References Powered by Scopus

A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems

5551Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social vulnerability to environmental hazards

3979Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework

1038Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Opportunities for research on mountain biodiversity under global change

71Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The maturation of ecosystem services: Social and policy research expands, but whither biophysically informed valuation?

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Incorporating social diversity into wildfire management: Proposing "Pathways" for fire adaptation

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flint, C. G. (2016). Framing the Human Dimensions of Mountain Systems: Integrating Social Science Paradigms for a Global Network of Mountain Observatories. In Mountain Research and Development (Vol. 36, pp. 528–536). International Mountain Society. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00110.1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

60%

Researcher 9

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 15

50%

Social Sciences 10

33%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

10%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free