A thirteen-year follow-up of respiratory effects of acute exposure to sulfur dioxide

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: In 1977, nine men were accidentally exposed to sulfur dioxide in an explosion in a pyrite mine. The lung function of seven men was followed after the accident. A four-year follow-up has been published previously. The greatest decrease in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1.0), and maximal midexpiratory flow (MMEF) was observed one week after the accident, after which all these parameters improved without reaching the preaccident level. Reversible bronchial obstruction was still present in three patients, and a positive reaction in the histamine challenge test was found for four. In the present paper, the lung function follow-up 13 years after the accident is reported for six men. Methods: The patients' clinical condition, chest X-ray, spirometry, and histamine challenge test were studied 13 years after the incident. Results: Spirometry was normal in one worker, two displayed obstruction, and three had a combined obstructive and restrictive, mainly obstructive, ventilatory impairment. In the histamine challenge test, four patients showed bronchial hyperreactivity, one with a nearly significant reaction. Because of bronchial obstruction one patient could not perform the challenge test. Conclusions: This 13-year follow-up showed that acute inflammatory obstruction caused by exposure to sulfur dioxide left, as sequelae, obstructive impairment of ventilatory function and permanent bronchial hyperreactivity. The clinical picture displayed by these patients was named the 'reactive airways dysfunction syndrome' (RADS) in 1985. Four of the patients also showed symptoms of chronic bronchitis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Piirilä, P. L., Nordman, H., Korhonen, O. S., & Winblad, I. (1996). A thirteen-year follow-up of respiratory effects of acute exposure to sulfur dioxide. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 22(3), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.130

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free