Predicting Long-Term Mortality, Morbidity, and Survival Outcomes Following a Cardiac Event: A Cardiac Rehabilitation Study

  • Graham H
  • Lac A
  • Lee H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The consequences of coronary heart disease (CAD) are many with premature death a potential reality. 1 Outpatient phase II cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a non-invasive health care intervention that assists in the management of modifiable CAD risk factors. In the United States, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and third-party payers reimburse for CR. Historically, patients were enrolled within 3 months following hospital discharge 2 whereas today patients are enrolled earlier. Participants in CR demonstrate significant physical and psychosocial benefits. 3-6 Although a referral to CR is a Class 1A recommendation following an acute cardiac event programs are underutilized. 7,8 Mortality and morbidity are two outcomes studied to determine the effectiveness of CR services. Considered a secondary health prevention intervention, 9 CR is associated with reductions in mortality and morbidity. 3,10,11 In two seminal works published three decades ago, a 20% to 25% reduction in mortality was observed. 12,13 O'Connor and colleagues 12 in 1989 analyzed 22 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of myocar-dial infarction (MI) patients and found CR effective in reducing all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV)-related mortality (odds ratio, OR = 0.80 and OR = 0.78, respectively). Subsequent studies including a number of reviews continue to support CR as an effective and efficient health care intervention. 10,11,14 In a 2012 overview of 6-independent CR meta-analyses including 13,824 patients, Oldridge 15 identified reductions in mortality and hospitalizations outcomes similar to results from their 1988 review. 13 The results for reduced ABSTRACT BACkgROund: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been shown to decrease mortality and morbidity but estimations vary. While there is significant literature supporting short-term benefits, there is not a similarly body of research as to long-term (LT) benefits. Low participation rates in CR are due to several causes and evidence demonstrating positive LT outcomes could be a catalyst to increased participation rates.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Graham, H. L., Lac, A., Lee, H., & Benton, M. J. (2019). Predicting Long-Term Mortality, Morbidity, and Survival Outcomes Following a Cardiac Event: A Cardiac Rehabilitation Study. Rehabilitation Process and Outcome, 8, 117957271982761. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179572719827610

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

74%

Researcher 4

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 19

56%

Medicine and Dentistry 8

24%

Sports and Recreations 4

12%

Social Sciences 3

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0