Causation: One word, many things

161Citations
Citations of this article
189Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We currently have on offer a variety of different theories of causation. Many are strikingly good, providing detailed and plausible treatments of exemplary cases; and all suffer from clear counterexamples. I argue that, contra Hume and Kant, this is because causation is not a single, monolithic concept. There are different kinds of causal relations imbedded in different kinds of systems, readily described using thick causal concepts. Our causal theories pick out important and useful structures that fit some familiar cases-cases we discover and ones we devise to fit. Copyright 2004 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cartwright, N. (2004). Causation: One word, many things. In Philosophy of Science (Vol. 71, pp. 805–819). https://doi.org/10.1086/426771

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free