Aortic annulus diameter measurement: What is the best modality?

10Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clarify the most suitable method to measure the aortic annulus diameter. Patients and Methods: Fifty-five patients, who had undergone aortic valve replacement at Miyazaki University Hospital between April 2008 and May 2011, were included in this study. The maximum diameter of the sizing tool that could be inserted into the left ventricle through the annulus had been predicted, based on the diameter measured by each modality. Agreement with surgery and each imaging modality, namely transthoracic echocardiography, multidetector computed tomography and contrast angiography, were compared using Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The predicted aortic annulus diameter, based on the diameter measured by transthoracic echocardiography, multidetector computed tomography and contrast angiography, was 20.3 ± 2.50, 23.9 ± 3.19, and 23.5 ± 3.55 mm, respectively, whereas, the diameter measured at surgery was 23.7 ± 2.99 mm. Predicted aortic annulus diameter measured by multidetector computed tomography best agreed with that measured at surgery. Conclusion: We conclude that the aortic annulus diameter, measured by multidetector computed tomography, is the best modality to measure the aortic annulus diameter. © 2012 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yano, M., Nakamura, K., Nagahama, H., Matsuyama, M., Nishimura, M., & Onitsuka, T. (2012). Aortic annulus diameter measurement: What is the best modality? Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 18(2), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.11.01727

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free