Should i stay or should i go? The impact of the expenses scandal on MPs’ decisions to stand down

2Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In total, 149 MPs stood down before the 2010 general election, but to what extent was the expenses scandal a factor in MPs’ decisions to retire or voluntarily exit the House of Commons? This chapter adopts Jacobson and Kernell’s (1983) strategic politicians hypothesis, arguing that, similar to the US banking scandal, British MPs acted strategically, taking advantage of available information in decisions relating to their electoral prospects. The evidence here suggests that the expenses scandal was a factor in MPs’ decisions to stand down. It did not, however, have the impact many suspected given the intense media scrutiny and public outrage following the Daily Telegraph’s initial revelations: more mundane and less controversial factors such as age and seniority played a bigger role.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

vanHeerde-Hudson, J. (2014). Should i stay or should i go? The impact of the expenses scandal on MPs’ decisions to stand down. In The Political Costs of the 2009 British MPs’ Expenses Scandal (pp. 62–87). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137034557_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free