A Moral Argument Against Miracles

  • Keller J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Those who believe that miracles (temporary suspensions of some law of nature accomplished by divine power) have occurred typically hold that they are rare and that only a small percentage of all people have been eyewitnesses to them or been direct beneficiaries of them. Although a claim that they occur far more frequently would be empirically highly implausible, I argue that the claim that God performs miracles in such a pattern unavoidably implies that God is guilty of unfairness. I articulate a criterion of fairness, discuss various types of miracles, and defend my conclusion against a variety of possible rejoinders.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keller, J. A. (1995). A Moral Argument Against Miracles. Faith and Philosophy, 12(1), 54–78. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil199512119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free