Judging laura: Perceived qualities of a mediated human versus an embodied agent

5Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Increasingly, embodied agents take over tasks which are traditionally performed by humans. But how do users perceive these embodied agents? In this paper, we describe an experiment in which we compared a real person and a virtual character giving route instructions. The voice, the outfit and the gestures were kept (close to) identical for both cases. The participants judged them, among other things, on trustworthiness, personality and presentation style. In contrast to the outcome of earlier investigations, in most categories the agent scored better or comparable to the human guide. This suggests that embodied agents are suitable to take the place of humans in information-giving applications, provided that natural sounding speech and natural looking nonverbal behaviors can be achieved. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ham, R. T., Theune, M., Heuvelman, A., & Verleur, R. (2005). Judging laura: Perceived qualities of a mediated human versus an embodied agent. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3661 LNAI, pp. 381–393). https://doi.org/10.1007/11550617_32

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free