Endovascular Perfusion Augmentation for Critical Care Decreases Vasopressor Requirements while Maintaining Renal Perfusion

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background:Ischemia reperfusion injury causes a profound hyperdynamic distributive shock. Endovascular perfusion augmentation for critical care (EPACC) has emerged as a hemodynamic adjunct to vasopressors and crystalloid. The objective of this study was to examine varying levels of mechanical support for the treatment of ischemiareperfusion injury in swine.Methods:Fifteen swine underwent anesthesia and then a controlled 30% blood volume hemorrhage followed by 30min of supra-celiac aortic occlusion to create an ischemia-reperfusion injury Animals were randomized to standardized critical care (SCC), EPACC with low threshold (EPACC-Low), and EPACC with high threshold (EPACC-High). The intervention phase lasted 270min after injury Hemodynamic markers and laboratory values of ischemia were recorded.Results:During the intervention phase, SCC spent 82.4% of the time avoiding proximal hypotension (>60mm Hg), while EPACC-Low spent 97.6% and EPACC-High spent 99.5% of the time avoiding proximal hypotension, P<0.001. Renal artery flow was statistically increased in EPACC-Low compared with SCC (2.29mL/min/kg vs. 1.77mL/min/kg, P<0.001), while renal flow for EPACC-High was statistically decreased compared with SCC (1.25mL/min/kg vs. 1.77mL/min/kg, P<0.001). EPACC animals required less intravenous norepinephrine, (EPACC-Low: 16.23mcg/kg and EPACC-High: 13.72mcg/kg), compared with SCC (59.45mcg/kg), P=0.049 and P=0.013 respectively.Conclusions:Compared with SCC, EPACC-High and EPACC-Low had decreased norepinephrine requirements with decreased frequency of proximal hypotension. EPACC-Low paradoxically had increased renal perfusion despite having a mechanical resistor in the aorta proximal to the renal arteries. This is the first description of low volume mechanical hemodynamic support in the setting of profound shock from ischemia-reperfusion injury in swine demonstrating stabilized proximal hemodynamics and augmented distal perfusion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patel, N. T. P., Gaffley, M., Leblanc, M. J. R., Lane, M. R., Kratky, L. E., Hoareau, G. L., … Williams, T. K. (2022). Endovascular Perfusion Augmentation for Critical Care Decreases Vasopressor Requirements while Maintaining Renal Perfusion. Shock, 57(5), 740–748. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001917

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free