Network Meta-analysis: Users’ Guide for Surgeons: Part II – Certainty

20Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the previous article (Network Meta-analysis: Users’ Guide for Surgeons—Part I, Credibility), we presented an approach to evaluating the credibility or methodologic rigor of network meta-analyses (NMA), an innovative approach to simultaneously addressing the relative effectiveness of three or more treatment options for a given medical condition or disease state. In the second part of the Users’ Guide for Surgeons, we discuss and demonstrate the application of criteria for determining the certainty in effect sizes and directions associated with a given treatment option through an example pertinent to clinical orthopaedics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chaudhry, H., Foote, C. J., Guyatt, G., Thabane, L., Furukawa, T. A., Petrisor, B., & Bhandari, M. (2015, July 8). Network Meta-analysis: Users’ Guide for Surgeons: Part II – Certainty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4287-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free