Posthumanism vs. Transhumanism: From the “End of Exceptionalism” to “Technological Humanism”

3Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstract: Posthumanism and transhumanism are often identified. However, modern researchers indicate the fundamental difference between these intellectual schools. The fundamental idea of posthumanism is the rejection of biological, ethical, and ontological anthropocentrism. Transhumanism focuses on changing and improving natural human characteristics through biological, technological, and cognitive modifications. While posthumanism draws attention to the crisis of humanism, transhumanism is the latter’s heir. Scientific and ethical consequences of posthumanism, as well as the sociocultural potential of transhumanism, are considered in this article. Posthumanism carries risks of shifting the value focus from man to other objects, which in the long term can lead to a critical decrease in the value status of man. Transhumanism has the potential to preserve man as an effective economic and cognizing agent. It is suggested that Russian society has a sociocultural potential for moving towards “technological humanism”.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Merzlyakov, S. S. (2022). Posthumanism vs. Transhumanism: From the “End of Exceptionalism” to “Technological Humanism.” Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 92, S475–S482. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331622120073

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free