EGF61A>G polymorphism as predictive marker of clinical outcome to first-line capecitabine and oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer

27Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present study was to investigate polymorphisms related to the metabolism of fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin, thymidylate synthase (TS) and excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1) 118, in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX). We also investigated the importance of the EGF61A>G polymorphism, which holds a functional influence on the tyrosine kinase receptor regulation. Materials and methods: We included 68 patients treated with first-line XELOX. Polymorphism analyses were carried out on pretreatment blood samples. Response was evaluated according to the RECIST. Survival analysis was described by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank testing. Results: The overall response rate was 38% and the median overall survival 19.4 months. A favorable outcome was seen in patients with the EGF61A/G genotype compared with the combined group of A/A and G/G, with response rates of 57% and 18%, respectively (P = 0.001). There was a significantly different progression-free survival (P = 0.018) in favor of the A/G group. The TS and ERCC1 genotypes failed to provide any significant impact on the outcome. Conclusion: Polymorphism analysis of a simple blood sample is a feasible approach to biomarker analysis and the EGF61A>G polymorphism may influence the effect of first-line XELOX. Consequently, this marker deserves further investigation. © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spindler, K. L. G., Andersen, R. F., Jensen, L. H., Ploen, J., & Jakobsen, A. (2009). EGF61A>G polymorphism as predictive marker of clinical outcome to first-line capecitabine and oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer. Annals of Oncology, 21(3), 535–539. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp336

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free