Continuity and change in policy and practice: The case of the competently trained

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper proposes some new ways of understanding the relationship between policy and practice in vocational education and training (VET) in Australia. It argues that contemporary policy making in VET follows a rationalistic logic where things are divided up according to the separate spheres of policy formulation and policy implementation. The argument is exemplified through considering aspects of the design and implementation of competency-based education and training. It is claimed that education and training policy making contains a paradox insofar as it enacts separation of policy and practice worlds while relying upon their inseparability for its success. Practitioners who are alert to this paradox work the gap between these worlds and create new worlds in the process. Here, the policy-practice relation is an intricately entangled one where practitioners act as practical policy makers. The conclusion is drawn that contemporary policy making in VET establishes a partial picture of practice and, that dealing with this partiality involves (i) understanding policy and its instruments in terms of the multiple options it embeds, and (ii) reconfiguring the relationship between policy and practice. © 1998 Journal of Vocational Education and Training. All right reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mulcahy, D. (1998). Continuity and change in policy and practice: The case of the competently trained. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 50(3), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636829800200060

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free