An Empirical Study of Algorithms for Point-Feature Label Placement

276Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A major factor affecting the clarity of graphical displays that include text labels is the degree to which labels obscure display features (including other labels) as a result of spatial overlap. Point-feature label placement (PFLP) is the problem of placing text labels adjacent to point features on a map or diagram so as to maximize legibility. This problem occurs frequently in the production of many types of informational graphics, though it arises most often in automated cartography. In this paper we present a comprehensive treatment of the PFLP problem, viewed as a type of combinatorial optimization problem. Complexity analysis reveals that the basic PFLP problem and most interesting variants of it are NP-hard. These negative results help inform a survey of previously reported algorithms for PFLP; not surprisingly, all such algorithms either have exponential time complexity or are incomplete. To solve the PFLP problem in practice. then, we must rely on good heuristic methods. We propose two new methods, one based on a discrete form of gradient descent, the other on simulated annealing, and report on a series of empirical tests comparing these and the other known algorithms for the problem, Based on this study, the first to be conducted, we identify the best approaches as a function of available computation time. Categories and Subject Descriptors: H.5.2 [Information Interfaces and Presentation]: User interfaces-screen design. 1.2.1 [Artificial Intelligence]: Applications and Expert Systems-cartography. 1.3.5 [Computer Graphics]: Computational Geometry and Object Modeling-geometric algorithms, languages, and systems. General Terms: Algorithms, Experimentation. © 1995, ACM. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Christensen, J., & Marks, J. (1995). An Empirical Study of Algorithms for Point-Feature Label Placement. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 14(3), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1145/212332.212334

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free