An increasing number of science education researchers employ ethnography as their methodological approach. Moving away from post-positivistic perspectives, ethnographers in science education perceive science learning as a sociocultural process that is situated in macroscopic contexts and tend to have a high commitment to transforming the practices of science and lives of underserved learners (Brandt CB, Carlone H, Ethnogr Educ 7:143–150, 2012). In the ethnographic framework, researchers interact with participants and local communities for an extended period of time, immerse themselves in the research setting, and collect in-depth data based on the relationships built with them. While valuable, these methods also pose ethical questions. In this chapter, I present ethical quandaries that I have run into while conducting two ethnographic studies along three foci: benefiting study participants and their communities, building relationships with study participants, and constructing stories to tell from the study. Then, I discuss my research practices in response to those ethical quandaries, building on the ideas of humanizing research (Paris D, Winn MT, Humanizing research: decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, 2014). This chapter will call for enhanced reflexivity, relevance, and reciprocity throughout a research process especially when working with marginalized individuals and communities on the basis of race, class, and language among others.
CITATION STYLE
Ryu, M. (2020). Ethical Considerations in Ethnographies of Science Education: Toward Humanizing Science Education Research (pp. 71–89). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50921-7_5
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.