Gentrifier? Who, Me? Interrogating the gentrifier in the mirror

54Citations
Citations of this article
143Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Schlichtman and Patch suggest that there is an elephant sitting in the academic corner: while urbanists often use 'gentrification' as a pejorative term in formal and informal academic conversation, many urbanists are gentrifiers themselves. Even though urbanists have this firsthand experience with the process, this familiarity makes little impact on scholarly debate. There is, Schlichtman and Patch argue, an artificial distance in accounts of gentrification because researchers have not adequately examined their own relationship to the process. Utilizing a simple diagnostic tool that includes ten common aspects of gentrification, they compose two autoethnographic memoirs to begin this dialogue. © 2013 Urban Research Publications Limited.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schlichtman, J. J., & Patch, J. (2014). Gentrifier? Who, Me? Interrogating the gentrifier in the mirror. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(4), 1491–1508. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12067

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free