A Comparative Study of the Optimum Tuned Mass Damper for High-rise Structures Considering Soil-structure Interaction

28Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present paper focuses on the optimum design of tuned mass damper (TMD) as a device for control of the structures. The optimum free vibration parameters such as period and damping ratio depend on the soil condition. For this reason, the seven meta-heuristic algorithms namely colliding bodies optimization (CBO), enhanced colliding bodies optimization (ECBO), water strider algorithm (WSA), dynamic water strider algorithm (DWSA), ray optimization (RO) algorithm, teaching-learning-based optimization (TLBO) algorithm and plasma generation optimization (PGO) are used to find the TMD parameters considering soil-structure interaction (SSI) effects. These optimization methods are applied to a benchmark 40-story structure. For comparison, the obtained results of these algorithms are compared. The capability and robustness of the algorithms are investigated through the benchmark problem. The results are shown that the soil type affects the optimum values of the TMD parameters, especially for the soft soil. To evaluate the performance of the obtained parameters in both the frequency and time domains, time history displacement and acceleration transfer function of the top story of the structure are calculated for the model with and without considering the SSI effects.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

Metaheuristics: From Design to Implementation

3048Citations
1856Readers

Your institution provides access to this article.

748Citations
303Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaveh, A., & Ardebili, S. R. (2021). A Comparative Study of the Optimum Tuned Mass Damper for High-rise Structures Considering Soil-structure Interaction. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 65(4), 1036–1049. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.18386

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

80%

Social Sciences 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0