Comparative media studies in Africa: Challenges and paradoxes

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Drawing on previous work on the role of the media in the democratization processes of the Lusophone African countries (Angola, Cape Verde, Guinea-Bissau, Mozambique, and São Tomé and Príncipe), this chapter addresses the challenges and paradoxes of conducting comparative research focused on contexts where there are constraints to democratic development (although at different levels and gradation), and on which reliable information on key indicators is often missing. These are societies with different cultural expectations of democracy and political leadership, which do not fit neatly into most Western world conceptualizations. The research looked into the news media functions in democratization contexts and the role that different types of media, including new media technologies, have in creating and supporting the necessary conditions of democracy and in shaping the type of democracy that is actually being built. Finally, by examining the relation between media and politics and the dynamics of media, political, and social change, the research outlines the most important media uses and effects in these democratization contexts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salgado, S. (2018). Comparative media studies in Africa: Challenges and paradoxes. In The Palgrave Handbook of Media and Communication Research in Africa (pp. 195–211). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70443-2_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free