Ask me anything: Assessing academic dishonesty

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We provide a method for assessing self-reported rates of cheating among students. The method is both i) privacy-preserving in the sense that one cannot use answers as evidence that any particular student cheated and ii) non-anonymous in the sense that one can record each student's answer for use in future correlative studies. Because accuracy relies on students' willful participation, we describe how to convince students that they take no risk by taking the survey. This method showed that 42% of 847 students willfully cheated in an Algorithms course. Surveying 181 CS Theory students showed no difference in cheating rates on written vs. coding assignments.

References Powered by Scopus

Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias

2466Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

TMOSS: Using intermediate assignment work to understand excessive collaboration in large classes

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Bob or Bot: Exploring ChatGPT’s Answers to University Computer Science Assessment

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Online examinations in a large Australian CS1 course

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

AVERT (Authorship Verification and Evaluation Through Responsive Testing): an LLM-Based Procedure that Interactively Verifies Code Authorship and Evaluates Student Understanding

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brunelle, N., & Hott, J. R. (2020). Ask me anything: Assessing academic dishonesty. In SIGCSE 2020 - Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (p. 1375). https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3372658

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

67%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 2

50%

Engineering 1

25%

Psychology 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free