Fate of manuscripts previously rejected by the American Journal of Neuroradiology: A follow-up analysis

25Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Purpose: This is a follow-up article to "Fate of Submitted Manuscripts Rejected from the American Journal of Neuroradiology: Outcomes and Commentary." The purpose of this study was to quantify differences in citation frequency between manuscripts published in the American Journal of Neuroradiology (AJNR) and those published after AJNR rejection and to understand citation frequency differences among rejected manuscripts. Materials and Methods: In this study, a MEDLINE search identified all manuscripts published in AJNR in 2005 and those initially rejected by AJNR in 2004 but subsequently published elsewhere. Once identified, the citation frequencies of both groups were determined by using SCOPUS. Citation data were used in comparative studies between AJNR rejected and accepted articles and in studies comparing citation frequency differences among rejected manuscripts as a function of journal and/or publication classifications. Results: Among 315 subsequently published rejections from AJNR in 2004, 696 citations accumulated between 2005 and 2007 (2.4 citations/journal year), whereas 441 AJNR articles published in 2005 accumulated 2490 citations between 2005 and 2007 (6.4 citations/journal year, P

References Powered by Scopus

Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation

2142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The history and meaning of the journal impact factor

1974Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fate of submitted manuscripts rejected from the American Journal of Neuroradiology: Outcomes and commentary

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Scientific peer review

373Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biobanking 3.0: Evidence based and customer focused biobanking

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A multilevel modelling approach to investigating the predictive validity of editorial decisions: Do the editors of a high profile journal select manuscripts that are highly cited after publication?

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McDonald, R. J., Cloft, H. J., & Kallmes, D. F. (2009). Fate of manuscripts previously rejected by the American Journal of Neuroradiology: A follow-up analysis. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 30(2), 253–256. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1366

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 5

56%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

44%

Social Sciences 3

33%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

11%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free