As large eye-tracking datasets are created, data privacy is a pressing concern for the eye-tracking community. De-identifying data does not guarantee privacy because multiple datasets can be linked for inferences. A common belief is that aggregating individuals’ data into composite representations such as heatmaps protects the individual. However, we analytically examine the privacy of (noise-free) heatmaps and show that they do not guarantee privacy. We further propose two noise mechanisms that guarantee privacy and analyze their privacy-utility tradeoff. Analysis reveals that our Gaussian noise mechanism is an elegant solution to preserve privacy for heatmaps. Our results have implications for interdisciplinary research to create differentially private mechanisms for eye tracking.
CITATION STYLE
Liu, A., Xia, L., Duchowski, A., Bailey, R., Holmqvist, K., & Jain, E. (2019). Differential privacy for eye-tracking data. In Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium (ETRA). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3314111.3319823
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.