Telemedicine compared to standard face-to-face care for continuous positive airway pressure treatment: real-world Australian experience

8Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Study Objectives: We tested a telemedicine model of care to initiate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) living in remote Western Australia. Methods: A prospective study comparing telemedicine for CPAP initiation in a remote population versus standard face-to-face CPAP initiation in a metropolitan population. The primary outcome was average nightly CPAP use in the final week of a CPAP trial. Results: A total of 186 participants were allocated to either telemedicine (n = 56) or standard care (n = 130). The average distance from the study center for the telemedicine group was 979 km (±792 km) compared to 19 km (±14 km) for the standard care group. The CPAP trial duration in the standard care group was less than the telemedicine group (37.6 vs 69.9 days, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kosky, C., Madeira, N., Boulton, K., Hunter, M. T., Ling, I., Reynor, A., … Mcardle, N. (2022). Telemedicine compared to standard face-to-face care for continuous positive airway pressure treatment: real-world Australian experience. Sleep, 45(10). https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsac157

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free