Game analysis of Olympic, World and European Championships in men's handball

94Citations
Citations of this article
117Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The development of men's handball was analyzed using data from the Olympic, World and European Championships held within the last eight years. The most obvious change, especially within these last nine tournaments, was that men's handball was played more dynamically and rapidly, both in attack and defense, especially by European teams. The first aim of this study was to conduct a technical analysis of current handball and to determine factors related to success in this sport discipline. The second aim was to compare the data of European Championships with other tournaments, considering the success of European teams in Men's World Handball. The technical variables used to compare the tournaments included: the average number of attacks, the efficiency of attacks, the efficiency of goal throws, fast break goals per game, the efficiency of fast breaks, the efficiency of the goalkeeper, saves by the goalkeeper per game, number of turnovers per game, and the efficiency of position throws (wing, pivot, back court, break-through, fast break, and 7-meter). This technical analysis used cumulative statistics from the European Handball Federation and International Handball Federation. ANOVA revealed significant differences between the first eight teams in the European Championships and their counterparts in the other two tournaments (Olympics and World Championships) in terms of several technical variables. The results showed that the efficiency of fast break, pivot position and back court players affected the ranking in favor of the European teams in significant international tournaments. © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics.

Figures

  • Table 1 General Descriptive Statistics of Top-Eight Ranked Teams in 2 Olympics, 3 World Championships and 4 European Championships
  • Table 2 Kruskal-Wallis Analysis of Attack Efficiency (%) of Teams
  • Table 3 Kruskal-Wallis Test Results of Average Fast Break Goals Per Game M SD x2 p Statistical Differences
  • Table 4 Kruskal-Wallis Test Results for Fast Break Efficiency of the Teams
  • Table 6 Kruskal-Wallis Test Results Regarding the Ratio of Back Court Position Goals of the Teams to All Goals M SD x2 p Statistical Difference
  • Table 7 Kruskal-Wallis Test Results Regarding the Ratio of Fast Break Goals of the Teams to All Goals M SD x2 p Statistical Difference
  • Table 8 T-tests of the Different Technical Parameters Obtained From the Tournaments of Different Classifications Olimpics and World Ch.

References Powered by Scopus

Identifying and analyzing the construction and effectiveness of offensive plays in basketball by using systematic observation

89Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A multivariate assessment of offensive performance indicators in Men’s Handball: Trends and differences in the World Championships

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

From a static to a dynamic perspective in handball match analysis: A systematic review

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Match Statistics as Predictors of Team's Performance in Elite competitive Handball

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Performance analysis of male handball goalkeepers at the world handball championship 2015

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bilge, M. (2012). Game analysis of Olympic, World and European Championships in men’s handball. Journal of Human Kinetics, 35(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-012-0084-7

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 35

64%

Researcher 11

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Sports and Recreations 57

83%

Social Sciences 6

9%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

4%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0