Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: A meta-analysis

207Citations
Citations of this article
173Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the effect of intraoperative monitoring of neuromuscular function on the incidence of postoperative residual curarisation (PORC). PORC has been considered present when a patient has a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of < 0.7 or < 0.9. We analysed data from 24 trials (3375 patients) that were published between 1979 and 2005. We excluded data on mivacurium from this meta-analysis because only three studies had examined the incidence of PORC associated with its use. Long- and intermediate-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs had been given to 662 and 2713 patients, respectively. Neuromuscular function was monitored in 823 patients (24.4%). A simple peripheral nerve stimulator was used in 543 patients, and an objective monitor was used in 280. The incidence of PORC was found to be significantly lower after the use of intermediate neuromuscular blocking drugs. We could not demonstrate that the use of an intraoperative neuromuscular function monitor decreased the incidence of PORC. © The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naguib, M., Kopman, A. F., & Ensor, J. E. (2007). Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 98(3), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/ael386

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free