Comparison of quantamatrix multiplexed assay platform and genotype MTBDR assay using smear-positive sputum specimens from patients with multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Korea

6Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Rapid detection of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is crucial for timely treatment and management. The GenoType MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl (MTBDR) assays have been endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the detection of DR-TB. However, MTBDR assays cannot simultaneously detect multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB). Furthermore, interpretation of the MTBDR assay requires trained people, and the assay has low sample throughput, processing only up to 12 samples in parallel. We have developed the Quantamatrix Multiplexed Assay Platform (QMAP) to detect MDR-/XDR-TB simultaneously. The interpretation of QMAP results is automated, and the platform can process up to 96 samples in parallel. To compare the performance of QMAP with MTBDR assays, we performed QMAP and the MTBDR assay on 76 smear-positive, Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture-positive sputum specimens. Compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) results, the sensitivity and specificity of QMAP were 100 and 98% for rifampin resistance, 80 and 100% for isoniazid resistance, 44.4 and 100% for ethambutol resistance, 100 and 100% for fluoroquinolone resistance, and 100 and 100% for second-line injectable drug resistance, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MTBDR assays were 100 and 98% for rifampin resistance, 80 and 100% for isoniazid resistance, 44.4 and 98.1% for ethambutol resistance, 100 and 100% for fluoroquinolone resistance, and 100 and 100% for second-line injectable drug resistance, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of QMAP were 85.0 and 100%, respectively, for the detection of MDR-TB and 100 and 100%, respectively, for XDR-TB. The sensitivity and specificity of MTBDR assays was consistent with those of QMAP. Our study showed that the QMAP assay has sensitivity and specificity equivalent to that of MTBDR assays in smear-positive sputum specimens. In combination with phenotypic DST, QMAP might be useful as a supplementary DST assay for rapid detection of MDR-/XDR-TB.

References Powered by Scopus

Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance

1921Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients smear-negative for acid-fast bacilli

677Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Encoded microcarriers for high-throughput multiplexed detection

356Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mutation and transmission profiles of second-line drug resistance in clinical isolates of drug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis from hebei province, China

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Whole-Genome Sequencing to Identify Missed Rifampicin and Isoniazid Resistance Among Tuberculosis Isolates—Chennai, India, 2013–2016

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic evaluation of line probe assays for the diagnosis of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, S., Kim, Y., Chang, Y., Hirgo, W. K., Chang, C. L., Taesun, S., … Lee, H. (2019). Comparison of quantamatrix multiplexed assay platform and genotype MTBDR assay using smear-positive sputum specimens from patients with multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Korea. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10(MAY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01075

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 5

63%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

36%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

27%

Immunology and Microbiology 3

27%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free