Comparative study of tympanoplasty type I using periosteum versus tragal cartilage with perichondrium

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Various grafting materials and different techniques have been used for myringoplasty. The aim of the study was to compare the result of tympanoplasty in patients with safe-type chronic suppurative otitis media using periosteum versus tragal cartilage with perichondrium grafts through pre- and postoperative clinical and audiological evaluation. Results: There was statistically significant difference for mean air-bone gap for group A (23.4 dB ± 0.03 SD) when compared to group B (19.4 dB ± 4.2 SD) with P value 0.103. Also, there was statistically significant difference in the hearing gain in group A after 6 months (25.53 dB ± 6.26 SD) when compared to group B (19.63 dB ± 9.76 SD) and the P value was 0.003. Graft taken was superior in the periosteal group (95%), compared to the cartilage grafts (90%). Conclusion: Tympanoplasty with periosteal graft showed better hearing results and high rates of graft taken than tragal cartilage grafts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elmoursy, M. M., & Elbahrawy, M. M. (2021). Comparative study of tympanoplasty type I using periosteum versus tragal cartilage with perichondrium. Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-021-00100-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free