Smoking and progressive retinal nerve fibre layer thinning in glaucoma

2Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background/Aims To investigate the relationship between smoking and smoking intensity, and the rate of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thinning in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods In this longitudinal study, patients with POAG who had at least 3 years of follow-up with a minimum of 5 visits of optical coherence tomography (OCT) were enrolled. The smoking intensity was calculated as the pack-year at the baseline OCT. Univariable and multivariable linear mixed models were used to determine the effect of each parameter on the rates of RNFL thinning over time. Non-linear least-squares estimation with piecewise regression model was used to investigate the cut-off point for the relationship between circumpapillary RNFL thinning and smoking intensity. Results A total of 466 eyes of 314 patients were included over the mean (95% CI) follow-up of 6.6 (6.4 to 6.7) years. Of the 314 patients, 121 (39%) had reported any history of smoking. Greater smoking intensity was associated with faster RNFL thinning (-0.06 (95% CI -0.11 to 0.00) μm/year per 10 pack-year higher; p=0.031) after adjusted for confounding factors. RNFL thinning became significantly faster when smoking intensity was >8 pack-year. Conclusions Smoking intensity is associated with faster rates of RNFL thinning. Evaluation of smoking intensity might add information to the assessment of risk of glaucoma progression. Future studies are required to explore if withdrawing smoking as a modifiable risk factor can decrease progression in patients with glaucoma.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nishida, T., Mahmoudinezhad, G., Weinreb, R. N., Baxter, S. L., Eslani, M., Liebmann, J. M., … Moghimi, S. (2023). Smoking and progressive retinal nerve fibre layer thinning in glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 107(11), 1658–1664. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2022-321237

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free