Clinical efficiency and safety analysis of transcatheter closure of multiple atrial septal defects in adults

7Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs) is currently a reliable alternative to surgery, even though challenging in patients with multiple ASDs. Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficiency and safety of transcatheter closure in multiple ASDs. Methods: Multiple ASDs were diagnosed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The occlusive condition and distance between 2 adjacent ASDs were measured by TTE examination. Then, the number and size of the occluder(s) was determined. TTE examinations were performed after transcatheter closure as follow-up. Results: The transcatheter procedure was successful in 15 patients with multiple ASDs, using a single occluder in 9 patients and 2 occluders in the remaining 6 patients. Overall, 21 ASD occluders were implanted. During a follow-up period of 6 mo to 5 y, a slight residual shunt was found in 1 patient without any symptoms; a moderate residual shunt was identified at the inferior vena cava and the occluder was removed by surgery 1 mo after procedure. Other complications, including endocarditis, arrhythmia, thromboembolism, and atrioventricular valve damage were not recorded in any of the 15 patients during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Transcatheter closure of multiple ASDs is safe and efficient. Two occluders are necessary for the distance of 2 ASDs more than 7 mm, and a single occluder is sufficient for those 7 mm or less. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Song, Z. Y., He, G. X., Shu, M. Q., Hu, H. Y., Tong, S. F., Ran, B. L., … Jing, T. (2009). Clinical efficiency and safety analysis of transcatheter closure of multiple atrial septal defects in adults. Clinical Cardiology, 32(3), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20450

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free