Bone metabolism after human parturition and the effect of lactation: Longitudinal analysis of serum bone-related proteins and bone mineral content of the lumbar spine

16Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A prospective study was performed to investigate postpartum changes in human bone metabolism and the effects of lactation on them. The subjects consisted of two groups; 13 women who stopped breast-feeding within 3 months postpartum (short-term group) and 14 women who continued breast-feeding for more than 6 months postpartum (long-term group). Serum carboxyl-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP), carboxyl terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), and bone gla protein (BGP) were measured prepartum, and at 5 days, 1 month, 3 months and 9 months postpartum. Lumbar BMD was measured at 3-7 days, 3 months and 9 months postpartum. Between prepartum and 3 months postpartum, the values and variations in the markers were essentially the same in both groups. PICP was maintained at a constant and significantly higher level than the control value. In contrast, ICTP had increased markedly at 5 days postpartum, gradually decreasing thereafter. BGP was low prepartum and gradually increases. At 9 months postpartum, PICP and ICTP decreased to the control values in the short-term group. The postpartum time course of lumbar BMD showed a significant decrease in both groups at 3 months postpartum. Recovery to the puerperal level was seen at 9 months postpartum in the short-term group but not in the long-term group. In conclusion, bone resorption is stimulated by parturition as well as lactation resulting in postpartum loss of lumbar BMD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yasumizu, T., Nakamura, Y., Hoshi, K., Iijima, S., & Asaka, A. (1998). Bone metabolism after human parturition and the effect of lactation: Longitudinal analysis of serum bone-related proteins and bone mineral content of the lumbar spine. Endocrine Journal, 45(5), 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.45.679

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free