Efficacy and safety of high-dose tigecycline for the treatment of infectious diseases: A meta-analysis

30Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background:High-dose (HD) tigecycline regimen is increasingly used in infectious diseases, however its efficacy and safety versus low-dose (LD) is still unclear.Methods:A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed; PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, clinicalTrials.gov, Wanfang, VIP, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), were searched using terms "tigecycline" AND "dose" up to October 31, 2018. Eligible studies were randomized trials or cohort studies comparing mortality, clinical response, microbiological eradication and safety of different tigecycline dose regimens for any bacterial infection. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were clinical response rate, microbiological eradiation rate and adverse events (AEs). Meta-analysis was done with random-effects model, with risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated for all outcomes.Results:Of 951 publications retrieved, 17 studies (n=1041) were pooled in our meta-analysis. The primary outcome was available in 11 studies, and the RR for mortality was 0.67 (95% CI 0.53-0.84, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gong, J., Su, D., Shang, J., Yu, H., Du, G., Lin, Y., … Arora, G. (2019, September 1). Efficacy and safety of high-dose tigecycline for the treatment of infectious diseases: A meta-analysis. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017091

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free