Background:High-dose (HD) tigecycline regimen is increasingly used in infectious diseases, however its efficacy and safety versus low-dose (LD) is still unclear.Methods:A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed; PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, clinicalTrials.gov, Wanfang, VIP, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), were searched using terms "tigecycline" AND "dose" up to October 31, 2018. Eligible studies were randomized trials or cohort studies comparing mortality, clinical response, microbiological eradication and safety of different tigecycline dose regimens for any bacterial infection. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were clinical response rate, microbiological eradiation rate and adverse events (AEs). Meta-analysis was done with random-effects model, with risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated for all outcomes.Results:Of 951 publications retrieved, 17 studies (n=1041) were pooled in our meta-analysis. The primary outcome was available in 11 studies, and the RR for mortality was 0.67 (95% CI 0.53-0.84, P
CITATION STYLE
Gong, J., Su, D., Shang, J., Yu, H., Du, G., Lin, Y., … Arora, G. (2019, September 1). Efficacy and safety of high-dose tigecycline for the treatment of infectious diseases: A meta-analysis. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017091
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.