Gas Plasma-Oxidized Liquids for Cancer Treatment: Preclinical Relevance, Immuno-Oncology, and Clinical Obstacles

31Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Gas plasmas, often referred to as cold physical plasma, are currently being investigated for their potential to serve as anticancer agents. Along similar lines, gas plasma-oxidized liquids as a carrier for reactive oxygen species have found their way into preclinical research. This review focuses on in vivo studies that utilized such gas plasma-oxidized liquids for cancer therapies. These preclinical tumor models, treatment modalities, and types of liquids that were used are summarized and critically discussed. Among these studies, significant results were observed, indicating the potential of oxidative liquids to serve as an anticancer treatment. However, several steps have to be taken to enhance the quality and translational capacities of this approach in order to gain clinical acceptance for possible future cancer therapies. The most crucial steps include not only a careful selection of suitable liquids, with respect to their approval as medical products, but also the consideration of orthotopic and immunocompetent animal tumor models. This would increase the relevance of such studies and simultaneously allow studying the contribution of the most potent of all anticancer effectors, the immune system.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

770Citations
555Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

83Citations
89Readers

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Freund, E., & Bekeschus, S. (2021). Gas Plasma-Oxidized Liquids for Cancer Treatment: Preclinical Relevance, Immuno-Oncology, and Clinical Obstacles. IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, 5(6), 761–774. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRPMS.2020.3029982

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Researcher 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 1

25%

Chemistry 1

25%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

25%

Neuroscience 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0