REVERSING MATERIALITY: From a Reactive Matrix to a Proactive SDG Agenda

11Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Sustainability-oriented innovation strategies are often based on assessments of what is ‘material’ for companies in the short run. Materiality assessments are increasingly used as the basis for sustainability strategies. Extant practice, however, often leads to reactive approaches that might be less innovative than required for the sustainability issue at stake and even lead to window dressing (‘talk but not walk’). Leading companies can fall prey to the ‘incumbent’s curse’—the failure to adequately adapt to changed circumstances. The adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provides an alternative frame for materiality assessments that has the potential to overcome the curse. Consequently, the corporate challenge becomes how to make the SDGs (more) material for the corporate innovation strategy. This paper makes the argument for ‘reversing materiality’ through the adoption of the SDGs—as a proactive way to escape the incumbent’s curse. Examples of emerging practices of leading companies are given.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Tulder, R., & Lucht, L. (2019). REVERSING MATERIALITY: From a Reactive Matrix to a Proactive SDG Agenda. In Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business in Association with Future Earth (pp. 271–289). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97385-2_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free