A guide to reading and using systematic reviews of qualitative research

41Citations
Citations of this article
157Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is an increasingly widespread policy momentum to increase patient-centred care and to improve quality of life outcomes within health services. Qualitative research methods are used to elicit in-depth and detailed insights into people's attitudes, beliefs, emotions and experiences - much of which may remain unspoken during clinical encounters. Questions about patients' beliefs and preferences for treatment can be addressed by qualitative research and inform evidence-based strategies for delivering patient-centred care. Systematic reviews of multiple primary qualitative studies bring together findings from different studies to offer new and more comprehensive understandings of social phenomena across various healthcare contexts and populations and are an emerging methodology in the literature including for care in chronic kidney disease. This article will provide a framework for the systematic review of qualitative research so readers can make sense of these study types and use them in clinical care and policy.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

23911Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews

5294Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects

4768Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Metasynthesis: An original method to synthesize qualitative literature in psychiatry

245Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Competing narratives of nature-based solutions: Leveraging the power of nature or dangerous distraction?

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The experiences of spirituality among adults with mental health difficulties: a qualitative systematic review

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tong, A., Palmer, S., Craig, J. C., & Strippoli, G. F. M. (2016, June 24). A guide to reading and using systematic reviews of qualitative research. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfu354

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 60

68%

Researcher 12

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 37

44%

Nursing and Health Professions 28

33%

Social Sciences 13

15%

Psychology 6

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free