On the relationship between reading, listening, and speaking: It's different for people's names

30Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Two experiments are reported that tested predictions derived from the framework of face, object, and word recognition proposed by Valentine, Brennen, and Bredart (1996). The findings were as follows: (1) Production of a celebrity's name in response to seeing the celebrity's face primed a subsequent familiarity decision to the celebrity's printed name. The degree of repetition priming observed was as great as that observed when a familiarity decision to the printed name was repeated in the prime and test phases of the experiment. (2) Making a familiarity decision to an auditory presentation of a celebrity's name primed a familiarity decision to the same celebrity's name presented visually. The magnitude of cross-modality priming was as great as the magnitude of within-modality repetition priming. This result for people's names contrasted with the effects observed in lexical decision tasks, in which no reliable cross-modality priming was observed. The results cannot be accounted for by previous models of face and name processing. They show a marked contrast between processing people's names and processing words. The results support the framework proposed by Valentine et al. (1996). The implications for models of speech production, perception, and reading are discussed, together with the potential of the methodology to elucidate our understanding of proper name processing.

References Powered by Scopus

Understanding face recognition

3162Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Spreading-Activation Theory of Retrieval in Sentence Production

2472Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs

2154Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Impaired naming of unique landmarks is associated with left temporal polar damage

122Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Are faces special in Alzheimer's disease? Cognitive conceptualisation, neural correlates, and diagnostic relevance of impaired memory for faces and names

82Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

N200, N250r, and N400 Event-Related Brain Potentials Reveal Three Loci of Repetition Priming for Familiar Names

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Valentine, T., Hollis, J., & Moore, V. (1998). On the relationship between reading, listening, and speaking: It’s different for people’s names. Memory and Cognition, 26(4), 740–753. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211394

Readers over time

‘12‘14‘15‘16‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

29%

Researcher 4

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 13

57%

Linguistics 6

26%

Neuroscience 2

9%

Engineering 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0