Quality improvement in practice-part two: Applying the joy in work framework to healthcare

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As healthcare systems emerge from the COVID-19 and begin the process of recovery and rebuilding, it is more important than ever to find systematic ways to ensure that all healthcare staff are focusing on their wellbeing, are able to reflect on new ways of working and find methods to improve their experience at work. This article, the second in a three-part series on the practical application of quality improvement in healthcare, presents four case studies that demonstrate the learning from four healthcare systems that have been applying both quality improvement and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's 'joy in work' framework to enhance staff wellbeing and experience. These case studies demonstrate the benefits of involving staff deeply in the process of understanding factors that impact on experience at work, developing and testing creative ideas that can make a difference. The ideas that emerged were diverse and highly contextualised to the local service. Ideas related most strongly to four areas: Wellness and resilience, daily improvement, camaraderie and teamwork, and recognition and reward. The systematic approach that quality improvement brings is potentially replicable across all healthcare settings, and can provide a way for all teams to have greater ownership and control over their wellbeing and experience at work.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

65Citations
280Readers

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shah, A., Harken, J., & Nelson, Z. (2021). Quality improvement in practice-part two: Applying the joy in work framework to healthcare. British Journal of Health Care Management, 27(9), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2021.0022

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

40%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

20%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

20%

Arts and Humanities 1

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0