Exploratory study to evaluate two clinical methods for assessing moisturizing effect on skin barrier repair

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Two clinical methods of assessing a moisturizer's effect on stratum corneum (SC) barrier repair were evaluated in female subjects with dry skin, to identify an assessment method for future studies. Methods: In this single-centre, split-body study, women with dry skin applied moisturizer before (method A) or after (method B) SC barrier perturbation using D-Squame® stripping discs. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and residual protein on D-Squame discs were assessed over 14 days. Results: Twenty-four subjects were included. For method A, the mean slope values of plots of 1/TEWL vs cumulative protein removed decreased over time for both treated and untreated areas, indicating improved SC barrier quality. There were no significant differences between treated and untreated areas, although a trend to a more negative slope was observed by Day 14 in the treated areas (P = 0.082), suggesting treatment improved barrier quality. For method B, using pre- and post-stripping as covariates, no statistical differences/trends were observed between treated and untreated areas for change in TEWL from post-stripping to any evaluation from Days 3-14. TEWL values returned towards pre-stripping values for treated and untreated areas by the initial Day 3 evaluation. Conclusion: For method A, there were trends suggesting the moisturizing treatment improved SC barrier quality. For method B, there were no significant differences/trends between treated and untreated areas. Further assessment with different methodologies is warranted to design appropriate clinical protocols for evaluating accelerated skin barrier repair. These data are insufficient to conclude whether the product or methodology was responsible for the results.

References Powered by Scopus

The skin: An indispensable barrier

1450Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Methods for the Assessment of Barrier Function

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Characteristic differences in barrier and hygroscopic properties between normal and cosmetic dry skin. I. Enhanced barrier analysis with sequential tape-stripping

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Portable Ultrawideband Confocal Raman Spectroscopy System with a Handheld Probe for Skin Studies

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Association between the Level of Advanced Glycation End Products and Objective Skin Quality Parameters

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use of barrier products in order to prevent complications in the peristomal skin

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Snatchfold, J., & Targett, D. (2019). Exploratory study to evaluate two clinical methods for assessing moisturizing effect on skin barrier repair. Skin Research and Technology, 25(3), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12632

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

86%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

56%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

11%

Engineering 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free