Chronobiology of labour pain perception: An observational study

38Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Circadian variation may affect many biological and pharmacological phenomena. Methods. To assess circadian variations in labour pain perception, 222 consecutive nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancy, spontaneous labour, cervical dilatation (3-5 cm), ruptured membranes and normal fetal heart rate tracings were studied. Visual analogue pain scores (VAPS) were analysed and divided into four periods: night (1:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m.), morning (7:01 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.), afternoon (1:01 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.) and evening (7:01 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.). VAPS were also compared between daytime (morning+afternoon) and nocturnal (evening+night) periods. Results. Daytime mean VAPS were lower than nocturnal scores [75.6 (15.1) vs 85.7 (14.1), P<0.0001]. VAPS were lower in the morning than in the afternoon, evening and night periods (ANOVA, P<0.0001). Conclusion. Labour pain perception appears to be chronobiological, and this might be taken into account when enrolling parturients in studies designed to assess or treat labour pain. © The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aya, A. G. M., Vialles, N., Mangin, R., Robert, C., Ferrer, J. M., Ripart, J., & de La Coussaye, J. E. (2004). Chronobiology of labour pain perception: An observational study. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 93(3), 451–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeh223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free