Attentional factors in conceptual congruency

44Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Conceptual congruency effects are biases induced by an irrelevant conceptual dimension of a task (e.g., location in vertical space) on the processing of another, relevant dimension (e.g., judging words' emotional evaluation). Such effects are a central empirical pillar for recent views about how the mind/brain represents concepts. In the present paper, we show how attentional cueing (both exogenous and endogenous) to each conceptual dimension succeeds in modifying both the manifestation and the symmetry of the effect. The theoretical implications of this finding are discussed. © 2012 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Orienting of attention.

7665Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The attention system of the human brain

6312Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind

3010Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Are Automatic Conceptual Cores the Gold Standard of Semantic Processing? The Context-Dependence of Spatial Meaning in Grounded Congruency Effects

139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Embodiment and second-language: Automatic activation of motor responses during processing spatially associated L2 words and emotion L2 words in a vertical Stroop paradigm

78Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Language as a disruptive technology: Abstract concepts, embodiment and the flexible mind

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Santiago, J., Ouellet, M., Román, A., & Valenzuela, J. (2012). Attentional factors in conceptual congruency. Cognitive Science, 36(6), 1051–1077. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01240.x

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 48

62%

Professor / Associate Prof. 15

19%

Researcher 10

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 57

77%

Linguistics 11

15%

Computer Science 3

4%

Social Sciences 3

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0