Encoding variability, levels of processing, and the effects of spacing of repetitions upon judgments of frequency

25Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Two experiments were carried out to compare the component-levels theory and the levels-of-processing hypothesis as explanations of the effect the spacing between repetitions of an item has upon the retention of that item. Retention was measured by judgments of frequency, frequency discrimination, and derived recognition scores. Variable encoding contexts facilitated recognition relative to repeated encoding contexts, while the latter biased subjects toward giving high judgments of frequency. The results in general were consonant with predictions derived from a levels-of-processing explanation of the spacing effect rather than the component-levels theory. A modification of the latter theory to incorporate the former was suggested as a view of the memorial representation of repeated stimuli. © 1980 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Levels of processing: A framework for memory research

6587Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory

2831Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition

335Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice

160Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

About practice. Repetition, spacing, and abstraction.

126Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effect of spacing repetitions on the recognition memory of young children and adults

76Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rose, R. J. (1980). Encoding variability, levels of processing, and the effects of spacing of repetitions upon judgments of frequency. Memory & Cognition, 8(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197555

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘12‘13‘15‘17‘20‘21‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 4

44%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 8

67%

Neuroscience 3

25%

Linguistics 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0