Difference in postoperative opioid consumption after spinal versus general anaesthesia for ankle fracture surgery—A retrospective cohort study

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Surgical treatment of ankle fracture is associated with significant pain and high postoperative opioid consumption. The anaesthesia method may affect early postoperative pain. The main objective of the study was to compare postoperative opioid consumption after ankle-fracture surgery between patients treated with spinal anaesthesia and general anaesthesia. Methods: We reviewed retrospectively the files of 586 adult patients with surgically treated ankle fracture in the years 2014 through 2016. The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the first 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes were maximal pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, the length of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit, and opioid use in different time periods up to 48 h postoperatively. Propensity score matching was used to mitigate confounding variables. Results: Total opioid consumption 48 h postoperatively was significantly lower after spinal anaesthesia (propensity score-matched population: effect size −13.7 milligrams; 95% CI −18.8 to −8.5; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lehto, P. M., Vakkala, M. A., Alahuhta, S., Liisanantti, J. H., Kortekangas, T. H. J., Hiltunen, K., … Kaakinen, T. I. (2021). Difference in postoperative opioid consumption after spinal versus general anaesthesia for ankle fracture surgery—A retrospective cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 65(8), 1109–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13845

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free