Testing and controlling for horizontal pleiotropy with probabilistic Mendelian randomization in transcriptome-wide association studies

82Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Integrating results from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and gene expression studies through transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) has the potential to shed light on the causal molecular mechanisms underlying disease etiology. Here, we present a probabilistic Mendelian randomization (MR) method, PMR-Egger, for TWAS applications. PMR-Egger relies on a MR likelihood framework that unifies many existing TWAS and MR methods, accommodates multiple correlated instruments, tests the causal effect of gene on trait in the presence of horizontal pleiotropy, and is scalable to hundreds of thousands of individuals. In simulations, PMR-Egger provides calibrated type I error control for causal effect testing in the presence of horizontal pleiotropic effects, is reasonably robust under various types of model misspecifications, is more powerful than existing TWAS/MR approaches, and can directly test for horizontal pleiotropy. We illustrate the benefits of PMR-Egger in applications to 39 diseases and complex traits obtained from three GWASs including the UK Biobank.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

164Citations
80Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yuan, Z., Zhu, H., Zeng, P., Yang, S., Sun, S., Yang, C., … Zhou, X. (2020). Testing and controlling for horizontal pleiotropy with probabilistic Mendelian randomization in transcriptome-wide association studies. Nature Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17668-6

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

64%

Researcher 11

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 19

58%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

21%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

12%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 3

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0