Challenges: Findings from Previous Empirical Research

  • Hew K
  • Cheung W
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although asynchronous online discussions may afford certain advantages, such benefits can only be enjoyed if students choose to participate in the discussions. While students could participate by merely reading messages, such an act does not really encourage the exchange of ideas in the online discussion because if no messages are posted in the first place there will be no messages in the discussion for students to read. Unfortunately, students who actively contribute in online discussions are usually few in numbers. This chapter discusses the various factors or reasons that could lead to limited student contribution. Limited student contribution is defined as students making few postings, students exhibiting surface-level thinking, or students displaying low-level knowledge construction in online discussions. A comprehensive literature search across six electronic databases was conducted. Ten main factors that could lead to limited student contribution were identified after a review of more than 110 empirical research studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2012). Challenges: Findings from Previous Empirical Research. In Student Participation in Online Discussions (pp. 15–29). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2370-6_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free