Detecting suicidality among adolescent outpatients: Evaluation of trained clinicians' suicidality assessment against a structured diagnostic assessment made by trained raters

19Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of suicidality is of major importance. We aimed to evaluate trained clinicians' ability to assess suicidality against a structured assessment made by trained raters. Method: Treating clinicians classified 218 adolescent psychiatric outpatients suffering from a depressive mood disorder into three classes: 1-no suicidal ideation, 2-suicidal ideation, no suicidal acts, 3-suicidal or self-harming acts. This classification was compared with a classification with identical content derived from the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS-PL) made by trained raters. The convergence was assessed by kappa- and weighted kappa tests. Results: The clinicians' classification to class 1 (no suicidal ideation) was 85%, class 2 (suicidal ideation) 50%, and class 3 (suicidal acts) 10% concurrent with the K-SADS evaluation (γ2 = 37.1, df 4, p = 0.000). Weighted kappa for the agreement of the measures was 0.335 (CI = 0.198-0.471, p < 0.0001). The clinicians under-detected suicidal and self-harm acts, but over-detected suicidal ideation. Conclusion: There was only a modest agreement between the trained clinicians' suicidality evaluation and the K-SADS evaluation, especially concerning suicidal or self-harming acts. We suggest a wider use of structured scales in clinical and research settings to improve reliable detection of adolescents with suicidality. © 2008 Holi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holi, M. M., Pelkonen, M., Karlsson, L., Tuisku, V., Kiviruusu, O., Ruuttu, T., & Marttunen, M. (2008). Detecting suicidality among adolescent outpatients: Evaluation of trained clinicians’ suicidality assessment against a structured diagnostic assessment made by trained raters. BMC Psychiatry, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-97

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free