Self- and cross-incompatibility of various citrus accessions

63Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Self-incompatibility and compatibility of 65 citrus accessions were determined by pollen tube growth in the style. Lemon was self-compatible whereas the six pummelos and seven out of 11 its relatives were self-incompatible. Furthermore, among sour oranges and their relatives, two out of six accessions were, likewise, self-incompatible as were one out of five sweet orange and their relatives. Every yuzu and its relatives, except hyuga-natsu, were self-compatible. Of the mandarin and its relatives, 14 out of 28 accessions were self-incompatible, whereas calamondin, a kumquat relative, and Hedzuka daidai of diverse origin were self-compatible. Thirty-one out of 65 accessions used in this study were self-incompatible. Of the self-incompatible accessions, clementine and 'Ariake', a hybrid of navel orange and clementine, were cross-incompatible. Thus, the incompatible genotypes of those two accessions were considered to be identical.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yamamoto, M., Kubo, T., & Tominaga, S. (2006). Self- and cross-incompatibility of various citrus accessions. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 75(5), 372–378. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.75.372

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free